Which is evolving faster, brands or technology? The not so surprising answer.

September 16th, 2011 by chris.heile@hyperquake.com

Brands have always leaned heavily on technology. One might even say that brands owe their very existence to technology. After all, television, radio and print are what created mass brands in the first place. In the early days, we didn’t need to know how these analog systems worked or how to get the most out of them. Much like the computer you’re reading this on now, it didn’t require a technical degree to use it.

Today, technology is infiltrating every corner of our lives and with it has come an explosion of new interaction points with consumers. Clearly, our understanding of how technology works and how to use it as marketers must evolve. And in a dramatic way.

No longer can we get by without understanding the inner workings of these interrelated systems. We need to know how to customize and manipulate the many diverse parts to best fit our unique consumers and our unique brands. To be successful, we have to think more like programmers and less like users. Traditional media, social media, mobile media, web media, websites, blogs, CRM, SEO, SEM and everything new and exciting lurking around the corner must be mastered and programmed in order to see its true potential. And we haven’t even scratched the surface.

Every technology has a precise purpose and a particular effect. Each touch-point influences and appeals to very different groups of consumers. We now have the ability to program and optimize this vast network of technologies and media in our favor. To test out and prove what truly impacts sales, awareness, loyalty and short and long term growth. To eliminate waste and redundancy and track how every penny we spend drives consumer action.

To succeed in this increasingly complex, technology-laden world, we must be world-class hackers, manipulating data and technology to our own benefit.

Take advantage of this immense power and use it wisely to the peril of your competition.

Posted in Technology, Thinking, Uncategorized | No Comments »

Loyal to the Message or the Messenger?

June 24th, 2010 by Rachel Forgus

Long gone are the days when a consumers relied on “their” newspaper and “their” news station to provide them with all of the daily happenings he or she needed to know. In our era of instant gratification, we want information as fast as possible, with the source as a secondary issue.

A recent study by the Pew Research Center reveals what we already thought to be true: the leads in social media news differ greatly from those in the mainstream press. What is interesting, however, is the difference between social medias. Twitter appeals more to those looking for a technology update, while blogs, as well as the mainstream news, focus more on politics and government.

social-media

Today’s consumer is used to, and many times prefers, utilizing a variety of sources, Twitter, Facebook, CNN, etc. based on the interest of that particular person on the news on a particular subject. More often than not, a person will consult multiple news sources to ensure that it is indeed valid.

20060906-couricolbermann

While the consumer may not feel affiliated with a certain news source, he or she is much more attached to the messenger. For example, if Katie Couric switched from CBS to a rival station, odds are the viewer would still see Couric as a valuable information source and rely on her, regardless of location.

Posted in Thinking | 234 Comments »