Social Commerce

April 26th, 2012 by Caitlin Rose

I love to shop. I don’t mean just going to the mall shopping, I mean I will buy anything. Anywhere. I am a retailers dream. Ironic because I’m in the marketing industry and I’ve read Freakonomics. But I’m still a sucker.

I also love Facebook. Come on, what 20-something girl doesn’t? Heck, my mom loves Facebook. So wouldn’t that make me the ideal target for social commerce? My two (almost) favorite things in one place? So far, I haven’t bought anything on Facebook and I don’t plan to unless something pivotal changes.

When Allison Bradley, our Director of Client Leadership, wrote an article about social commerce in Multichannel Merchant, I began to think of myself and my purchasing habits. Why I buy things where I buy them and what triggers me to swipe my card. Then I thought of why I like Facebook and what I use it for. Although I whine and complain about the changes made since Facebook first came to fruition, I still log on daily and am attracted to retailers pages offering me a discount or information about their next big in-store event for ‘liking.’ So why am I so turned off by making a purchase?

Bradley highlights some very valid observations of how retailers can better utilize social commerce on Facebook to make users, like me, click ‘buy’. Facebook is a social platform and in order for retailers to get users to make a purchase, they must make the act inherently social by providing a product that they can share with their friends.

In my opinion, social commerce on Facebook shows some promise. I’m not in love with the idea of selling items on Facebook, but if a company gives me enough reason to buy, I always give in.

A good example of a social site that retailers have begun to utilize effectively for social commerce is Pinterest. As a user, I am sharing products that I like, or think are cool, with my friends and other users interested in the same categorized subject. Before I know it, I’m on a retailer’s site purchasing the iPhone cover my roommate pinned or the skirt the blogger on Pinterest was wearing. Companies are beginning to see the value in nonintrusively marketing their products on Pinterest in order to generate social buzz and ultimately lead users to purchase.

If retailers begin to tap into the reasons consumers use social websites and then seamlessly integrate the sale of their products without making the user feel like they are online shopping, social commerce will become successful.

 

Posted in Thinking | Comments Off

GOOD Ideas Cincinnati Update

April 16th, 2012 by Kate Kovalcin

GOOD Ideas has officially kicked off for us today. We got to meet with our city partners from Green Umbrella and the Greater Cincinnati Energy Alliance to get things started. Our task, as assigned by GOOD, is:

Homeowners in the Greater Cincinnati area are spending far more than they should on electricity and gas because their homes lack proper insulation, storm windows and efficient heating and cooling systems. Modest energy efficiency upgrades typically save homeowners 20-30% on their monthly utility bill, in addition to contributing to larger goals like reducing carbon emissions and spurring job creation and community development in neighborhoods. With the goals of saving money, reducing emissions and putting local residents to work, how do we get more Cincinnati households to perform energy efficiency upgrades on their home?

We are very excited to begin brainstorming solutions to this problem, and our kickoff meeting and getting the groundwork was a great start. We learned there are a lot of hurdles we will have to overcome; however, the results in getting the “greenies” all over Cincinnati to join in this effort could really start to form Cincinnati into one of the greener metro areas in the country. Exciting stuff!

Posted in Design, Fun, Thinking | Comments Off

Social Media 101

April 12th, 2012 by rachel.robbins@hyperquake.com

We are all aware of the great impact and growth of social media within society. Was anyone else aware that one can receive a Ph.D. in social media? Mark Bonchek received the first Ph.D. at Harvard on the matter of social media. I certainly was unaware of this. Studying Facebook and Twitter for homework sounds great, especially since these are the websites I always went to in order to avoid studies.

I recently read a very insightful article on an interview with Bonchek, social media expert, giving his thoughts on the unique revolutionary movement of social media. Learning the current affect social media will have on companies, brands and marketing, and the relationship among brands and customers was quite intriguing.  This article is a must read!

Posted in Fun, News, Thinking | Comments Off

Is information too easily communicated?

March 28th, 2012 by Kate Kovalcin

I have an entire board on Pinterest dedicated to infographics. They’re beautiful, carefully crafted pieces of information, to make it easier to digest. We should love them! It’s like reading a picture book for adults. However the increasing surge in infographics in recent years has caused us to be bombarded by information we otherwise wouldn’t really care about. But they looked cool, right? At first, we believed them. Sometimes startling pieces of information rapidly going viral up and down Twitter and Facebook feeds, it would spark public astonishment: “HOW COULD THIS BE? HOW DID WE NOT KNOW?!” And then we all lived in an ideal world where we would change whatever startling habits were going to give us cancer tomorrow, and then forget about it 5 minutes later.

Now, we seem so jaded by the astonishing information, that we tend to not even believe it anymore. Today, an infographic posted on FastCo. caught my attention, Red Meat is Killing Us. I’m always curious about things dealing with food, since it is my favorite thing in the world and all, so naturally I clicked on it. I read through these astronomical numbers (and despite being vegan and patting myself on the back for not adding to the statistic) and I didn’t wholeheartedly believe what it was telling me. It was just too crazy, right?

I read through the comments on the post. And there was a definite backlash on this graphic:
“The graphics are confusing, misleading and a little too retro.”
“I’m a vegetarian and even I found this completely offensive. Scare tactics.”
“This infographic is awful. Please don’t post anymore like this. It’s misleading. Fast Co, you should know better.”
And my personal favorite, “Seems like a pretty hysterical piece assembled very likely by a flaming vegan.”

The author responded to these comments with a link to a New York Times article where the information had come from.

I clicked the link, read through the article, and I felt at ease about the information. But, why? Why do we suddenly not trust these beautiful displays of information in exchange for just reading them first hand? The commenters on the original FastCo. post seem to feel that the information was somehow skewed based on the designers’ possible personal beliefs. Even when infographics have links, cited sources, and all of the other credentials that published news sources do, we still do not trust them as much. Is it because of the fact that it is designed that we feel that another person’s hands have been stirring up the information pot? Possibly. Or could it be that we just don’t want the information laid out so easily if it is things that we don’t necessarily want to digest? As designers, our first priority is to communicate information clearly and effectively. How can we elevate infographics to be back to their respectable, trustworthy glory days without alienating our viewers in the process?

Posted in Design, Thinking | 2 Comments »

Again. From The Top

March 27th, 2012 by AJ Mercer

Forgive me if I sound a little rusty, but I’m working off no sleep. The red-eye back from San Fran was unkind. I was there doing things like this…

That being said — blog revamp. It’s happening. Right. Now.

After a couple of drinks, some spirited debate, and a few more drinks — we’ve decided the ol’ blog needed a little bit more focus.

The focus?

Well, here’s the thing, there is no real focus. It’s just an interesting, honest dialog between you, the reader, and the lovely folks that work here. So expect that from now on. Some posts will be funny, others will be serious, and some will be about the Hunger Games. Who knows what to expect — we sure don’t.

So, have fun and enjoy.

Posted in Design, Fun, Thinking | Comments Off

The Oreo Turns “100″

March 5th, 2012 by Caitlin Rose

It may be 100 years old, but it’s still as popular as ever. The “Oreo” turns 100 and celebrates by honoring its brand heritage. Kraft Foods plans to stay true to Oreo’s roots – “Lick, Twist, Dunk” – but make it fresh for today.  This follows an emerging trend in consumer marketing, in which heritage brands show that they can pay tribute to the past and at the same time be relevant and contemporary.

This is the challenge for every brand – continue to evolve but always bring consumer along for the journey.

Read full article here.

Posted in News, Thinking | Comments Off

Hostess Brands may file for Chapter 11 — again

January 11th, 2012 by admin

Another lesson in why brands must evolve. Hostess fails to change with the times and files for bankruptcy protection – again.

Check out the MSN Money article to read the full story!

 

 

Posted in Thinking | Comments Off

Evolve, fade away . . . or, lose your way.

November 23rd, 2011 by Allison Bradley

Evolve, or fade away. This is the opening statement on our company web site and it is the perspective we at Hyperquake keep in mind with every design, strategy and web site deployment.

So what happens when a brand rapidly changes itself or stubbornly stays the same? What happens when a brand doesn’t follow the cues of its consumers or its industry? A brand fades away. And, sadly, a brand risks losing its way.

Why? Healthy brands, like healthy people or relationships, experience evolution. The dictionary definition for evolution is: “gradual development, a pattern formed by a series of movement.”

I’d like to add to that definition by stating for brands, it’s a: “gradual and purposeful development, a noticeable pattern formed by a series of meaningful movements.”

Sometimes those movements happen very fast. Sometimes the pattern takes only a few steps and other times one big leap. Regardless the path, a thread of consistency emerges when you respect the evolution of a brand—you see purpose and can trace the steps of strategic, consumer-centric choices made along the way.

A recent BBC Story “Have Japanese Brands Lost Their Way?”offers the perfect example of how a lack of proper brand evolution can result in losing your way.

The article highlights how Japanese tech companies stubbornly (and somewhat complacently) relied upon previous market dominance to grow their business versus listening to consumers and the ever-changing tech landscape. They failed to evolve and their companies have likewise failed to profit.

  • Panasonic predicted an annual net loss of $5.5 billion.
  • Hitachi reported a 48% drop in quarterly profit.
  • Sony expects a $1 billion loss in the current fiscal year.

A perfect example of this was Sony and its previous market dominance in portable music devices. The Sony Walkman was one of the world’s biggest brands but Sony didn’t evolve within the portable music space properly.  They ran after technology that wasn’t relevant, practical or affordable with their Song MiniDisc player. When Apple released the iPod in 2001, which met consumer needs in a relevant and innovative way, Sony still didn’t properly evolve. Instead they stubbornly held onto its MiniDisc technology till 2007 and didn’t completely sunset the product until earlier this year.

The BBC story is also quick to point out unforeseen circumstances that contributed to these brands’ current circumstances, i.e., the global economic crisis and the Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami.  However, the BBC also notes this problem was one of Japan’s own design. I agree.

When brands “rest on their laurels” they can become stale. When brands are complacent with market leadership, they don’t follow the lead of their consumers or industry. The result—these brands do not evolve; they fade away or lose their way.

I’m not suggesting that Sony will all the sudden fade away or “close its doors” because of their recent choices. However, the BBC story challenges us to evaluate the scenario and ask “Have Japanese Brands Lost Their Way?” And, that is an important lesson in brand evolution and brand leadership for all of us entrusted with being stewards of great brands—global, local or anything in between.

Posted in News, Technology, Thinking | Comments Off

Aspirational Design

October 5th, 2011 by Caitlin Rose

Human beings are unhappy. We are born wanting more.

Chris Heile suggests that marketers are guilty of making empty promises to consumers, ultimately leading them to constantly want more. The AdClub recently hosted the Digital Non-Conference where our very own Chris Heile provided a keynote presentation that was both inspirational and thought provoking. Chris posed the question: Do we really believe everything promised to us in a commercial or advertisement? It made me re-evaluate the relationships I have with brands.

I’ll admit, I am a loyal “girly” magazine reader. I’ll spend $5 on magazines with headlines such as “how to get sexier hair” and “his girlfriend wishlist.” I always want to know the next best thing and how I can get my hands on it. Similarly, I can only assume that men reach to magazines such as Men’s Health to discover how to get “your best body ever” and to “download this—and live longer!” Seems pretty ridiculous, right?

In their new commercials, Toyota suggests that if you’re a middle-aged couple you could instantly have more friends than your teenage son or daughter and a more active, fun lifestyle just by purchasing a Venza.

All of these empty promises made by marketers leave us wanting more. Based on a study by Michael Eysenck, Chris suggests that when we finally have the financial stability to audaciously spend on a Lamborghini, we’re instantly not rich enough and must get rich enough to buy a Maybach. When something good happens to you, like buying that new car, you’ve reached a new threshold and you are now driven to supersede it.

Chris suggests that relationships today between marketers and consumers, are “one night stands,” and that they should be long-term relationships of mutual growth with the thought that they are better together than apart. That’s what we want in our human relationships, right? So why should it be any different than the relationships we develop with the products we buy?

That’s where aspiration comes in. Aspirations are fulfilling. They are tied to values and beliefs. They reflect fundamental truth. They don’t require validation from others.

Exhibit A: Janet Champ’s Nike ads circa 1990.

That is not an empty promise- that is aspiration. Pulling at our heartstrings causing us to develop a life-long, spiritual connection to the brand.

Chris went on to explain the deeply personal connections that aspirational design creates, for example, Apple. What can you not create with an iSomething? Chris showed an entertaining family video that he created with his iPhone, iPad, iMovie- catch my drift? Apple pushes boundaries and provides their loyal consumers with the tools they need to enhance their lives.

Tom’s shoes builds their brand on the promise that they will donate a pair of shoes to kids in need for every pair you buy. How awful am I for not owning a pair? And that’s exactly the point: brands need to build long-lasting promises with their consumers.

A consumer knows when you’re insincere in your efforts. They can see right through your attempt to increase your top and bottom line. Consumers have the tools, now more than ever, to research your brand and everything it stands for. Then they make a decision based on their research. The greatest opportunity brands face is a lack of understanding their consumer. Understand your audience and what you mean to your desired audience. Target those who have the greatest potential for growth and find out what they are trying to achieve in their lives along with what their values are. If you understand your consumers, they will build a long lasting relationship with your brand.

Chris left us with some final thoughts:

1. Don’t simply look at consumers and where they are today. They want you to lead them to the next step and add value to their lives.

2. We have a responsibility. As marketers, we touch and influence many lives, we should impact them.

3. They grow. We grow. Consumers grow because of us, we grow because of them.

“You are not here merely to make a living. You are here in order to enable the world to live more amply, with greater vision, with a finer spirit of hope and achievement. You are here to enrich the world, and you impoverish yourself if you forget the errand.” – Woodrow Wilson

And last but not least, we, as marketing and technology professionals, are doing great work. Continue to help people and push them forward.

Posted in Design, Thinking | Comments Off

Qwikster: Hurry, make more light shine through (optimism).

September 22nd, 2011 by Dan Barczak

I generally don’t write posts about harsh critique, but after scrolling through my inbox on Sunday and reading a letter from Netflix CEO Reed Hastings (which has since changed to a more polished version on the Netflix blog), I couldn’t resist digging a little deeper. Although an intriguing read, Hastings’ apology has gone over like a lead balloon for many Netflix loyalists. (see the email here.)

The gist: The streaming service will retain the Netflix branding while the DVD-by-mail service will be named Qwikster. Hastings said the split will better serve customers in the long run because each company will be able to better focus on one type of service. Also, Qwikster will maintain the color equity of red with a new logo/brand, and will also include games, which opens up a whole new avenue for the conglomerate. The backlash and the support is staggering, and many are already detailing alternatives.

From a brand perspective, it will be interesting to see how Qwikster develops: what it looks like, how it’s perceived, how well the brand delivers, and what it means for future technologies such as applications and various platforms. If their website is any indication, things will be evolving and changing very rapidly, as everyone’s watching.

Posted in Design, Technology, Thinking | Comments Off