Another lesson in why brands must evolve. Hostess fails to change with the times and files for bankruptcy protection – again.
Check out the MSN Money article to read the full story!
Another lesson in why brands must evolve. Hostess fails to change with the times and files for bankruptcy protection – again.
Check out the MSN Money article to read the full story!
Posted in Thinking | No Comments »
Evolve, or fade away. This is the opening statement on our company web site and it is the perspective we at Hyperquake keep in mind with every design, strategy and web site deployment.
So what happens when a brand rapidly changes itself or stubbornly stays the same? What happens when a brand doesn’t follow the cues of its consumers or its industry? A brand fades away. And, sadly, a brand risks losing its way.
Why? Healthy brands, like healthy people or relationships, experience evolution. The dictionary definition for evolution is: “gradual development, a pattern formed by a series of movement.”
I’d like to add to that definition by stating for brands, it’s a: “gradual and purposeful development, a noticeable pattern formed by a series of meaningful movements.”
Sometimes those movements happen very fast. Sometimes the pattern takes only a few steps and other times one big leap. Regardless the path, a thread of consistency emerges when you respect the evolution of a brand—you see purpose and can trace the steps of strategic, consumer-centric choices made along the way.
A recent BBC Story “Have Japanese Brands Lost Their Way?”offers the perfect example of how a lack of proper brand evolution can result in losing your way.
The article highlights how Japanese tech companies stubbornly (and somewhat complacently) relied upon previous market dominance to grow their business versus listening to consumers and the ever-changing tech landscape. They failed to evolve and their companies have likewise failed to profit.
A perfect example of this was Sony and its previous market dominance in portable music devices. The Sony Walkman was one of the world’s biggest brands but Sony didn’t evolve within the portable music space properly. They ran after technology that wasn’t relevant, practical or affordable with their Song MiniDisc player. When Apple released the iPod in 2001, which met consumer needs in a relevant and innovative way, Sony still didn’t properly evolve. Instead they stubbornly held onto its MiniDisc technology till 2007 and didn’t completely sunset the product until earlier this year.
The BBC story is also quick to point out unforeseen circumstances that contributed to these brands’ current circumstances, i.e., the global economic crisis and the Japanese Earthquake and Tsunami. However, the BBC also notes this problem was one of Japan’s own design. I agree.
When brands “rest on their laurels” they can become stale. When brands are complacent with market leadership, they don’t follow the lead of their consumers or industry. The result—these brands do not evolve; they fade away or lose their way.
I’m not suggesting that Sony will all the sudden fade away or “close its doors” because of their recent choices. However, the BBC story challenges us to evaluate the scenario and ask “Have Japanese Brands Lost Their Way?” And, that is an important lesson in brand evolution and brand leadership for all of us entrusted with being stewards of great brands—global, local or anything in between.
Posted in News, Technology, Thinking | No Comments »
Human beings are unhappy. We are born wanting more.
Chris Heile suggests that marketers are guilty of making empty promises to consumers, ultimately leading them to constantly want more. The AdClub recently hosted the Digital Non-Conference where our very own Chris Heile provided a keynote presentation that was both inspirational and thought provoking. Chris posed the question: Do we really believe everything promised to us in a commercial or advertisement? It made me re-evaluate the relationships I have with brands.
I’ll admit, I am a loyal “girly” magazine reader. I’ll spend $5 on magazines with headlines such as “how to get sexier hair” and “his girlfriend wishlist.” I always want to know the next best thing and how I can get my hands on it. Similarly, I can only assume that men reach to magazines such as Men’s Health to discover how to get “your best body ever” and to “download this—and live longer!” Seems pretty ridiculous, right?
In their new commercials, Toyota suggests that if you’re a middle-aged couple you could instantly have more friends than your teenage son or daughter and a more active, fun lifestyle just by purchasing a Venza.
All of these empty promises made by marketers leave us wanting more. Based on a study by Michael Eysenck, Chris suggests that when we finally have the financial stability to audaciously spend on a Lamborghini, we’re instantly not rich enough and must get rich enough to buy a Maybach. When something good happens to you, like buying that new car, you’ve reached a new threshold and you are now driven to supersede it.
Chris suggests that relationships today between marketers and consumers, are “one night stands,” and that they should be long-term relationships of mutual growth with the thought that they are better together than apart. That’s what we want in our human relationships, right? So why should it be any different than the relationships we develop with the products we buy?
That’s where aspiration comes in. Aspirations are fulfilling. They are tied to values and beliefs. They reflect fundamental truth. They don’t require validation from others.
Exhibit A: Janet Champ’s Nike ads circa 1990.
That is not an empty promise- that is aspiration. Pulling at our heartstrings causing us to develop a life-long, spiritual connection to the brand.
Chris went on to explain the deeply personal connections that aspirational design creates, for example, Apple. What can you not create with an iSomething? Chris showed an entertaining family video that he created with his iPhone, iPad, iMovie- catch my drift? Apple pushes boundaries and provides their loyal consumers with the tools they need to enhance their lives.
Tom’s shoes builds their brand on the promise that they will donate a pair of shoes to kids in need for every pair you buy. How awful am I for not owning a pair? And that’s exactly the point: brands need to build long-lasting promises with their consumers.
A consumer knows when you’re insincere in your efforts. They can see right through your attempt to increase your top and bottom line. Consumers have the tools, now more than ever, to research your brand and everything it stands for. Then they make a decision based on their research. The greatest opportunity brands face is a lack of understanding their consumer. Understand your audience and what you mean to your desired audience. Target those who have the greatest potential for growth and find out what they are trying to achieve in their lives along with what their values are. If you understand your consumers, they will build a long lasting relationship with your brand.
Chris left us with some final thoughts:
1. Don’t simply look at consumers and where they are today. They want you to lead them to the next step and add value to their lives.
2. We have a responsibility. As marketers, we touch and influence many lives, we should impact them.
3. They grow. We grow. Consumers grow because of us, we grow because of them.
“You are not here merely to make a living. You are here in order to enable the world to live more amply, with greater vision, with a finer spirit of hope and achievement. You are here to enrich the world, and you impoverish yourself if you forget the errand.” – Woodrow Wilson
And last but not least, we, as marketing and technology professionals, are doing great work. Continue to help people and push them forward.
Posted in Design, Thinking | No Comments »
I generally don’t write posts about harsh critique, but after scrolling through my inbox on Sunday and reading a letter from Netflix CEO Reed Hastings (which has since changed to a more polished version on the Netflix blog), I couldn’t resist digging a little deeper. Although an intriguing read, Hastings’ apology has gone over like a lead balloon for many Netflix loyalists. (see the email here.)
The gist: The streaming service will retain the Netflix branding while the DVD-by-mail service will be named Qwikster. Hastings said the split will better serve customers in the long run because each company will be able to better focus on one type of service. Also, Qwikster will maintain the color equity of red with a new logo/brand, and will also include games, which opens up a whole new avenue for the conglomerate. The backlash and the support is staggering, and many are already detailing alternatives.
From a brand perspective, it will be interesting to see how Qwikster develops: what it looks like, how it’s perceived, how well the brand delivers, and what it means for future technologies such as applications and various platforms. If their website is any indication, things will be evolving and changing very rapidly, as everyone’s watching.
Posted in Design, Technology, Thinking | No Comments »
Brands have always leaned heavily on technology. One might even say that brands owe their very existence to technology. After all, television, radio and print are what created mass brands in the first place. In the early days, we didn’t need to know how these analog systems worked or how to get the most out of them. Much like the computer you’re reading this on now, it didn’t require a technical degree to use it.
Today, technology is infiltrating every corner of our lives and with it has come an explosion of new interaction points with consumers. Clearly, our understanding of how technology works and how to use it as marketers must evolve. And in a dramatic way.
No longer can we get by without understanding the inner workings of these interrelated systems. We need to know how to customize and manipulate the many diverse parts to best fit our unique consumers and our unique brands. To be successful, we have to think more like programmers and less like users. Traditional media, social media, mobile media, web media, websites, blogs, CRM, SEO, SEM and everything new and exciting lurking around the corner must be mastered and programmed in order to see its true potential. And we haven’t even scratched the surface.
Every technology has a precise purpose and a particular effect. Each touch-point influences and appeals to very different groups of consumers. We now have the ability to program and optimize this vast network of technologies and media in our favor. To test out and prove what truly impacts sales, awareness, loyalty and short and long term growth. To eliminate waste and redundancy and track how every penny we spend drives consumer action.
To succeed in this increasingly complex, technology-laden world, we must be world-class hackers, manipulating data and technology to our own benefit.
Take advantage of this immense power and use it wisely to the peril of your competition.
Posted in Technology, Thinking, Uncategorized | No Comments »
Under Armour Maryland Pride Video from NewMedia on Vimeo.
I couldn’t help but fall in love with Maryland’s new football ensemble, while flipping through ESPN the other night. I personally love the design. Not because it’s any better than Penn State’s classic old-school cool, or Oregon’s flashy neon from Nike. I love it because it made me stop dead in my tracks and say “what the hell is that?” I love it because it got my attention. It made Maryland football relevant. And it got people talking. That is great design.

(more…)
Posted in Design, Thinking | No Comments »

Focusing on our goal of creating an interface to encourage people to explore new places, events and areas of Cincinnati, we began brainstorming user stories. Each of us thought of the possible desires a person might have for using the app and created narratives in the frame of, “As a { role }, I want { feature }, so that { benefit }.” For example, “As an indecisive person I want an app that helps me make decisions, so I can spend less time debating.” We had many great responses. There were differing scenarios across the spectrum, ranging from general to specific. Some user narratives overlapped in content, while others were unique.
To filter the stories, we will bucket the narratives and try to define the features and benefits we’ve suggested. Next we will have to determine which narratives are most relevant to our goals so we can focus our attention as we continue to develop our ideas.
Posted in Design, Fun, Thinking | No Comments »
Today’s meeting took us a few steps back from sketching/mapping out the app to reevaluate who and what the app is for. Some of this reappraisal arose from the weekend’s outings by a few Quakers, who came back with a few jotted notes and ideas about their adventures. In short, we began to see that heading down one path would lead to the creation of more of a “Suggestion” app instead of the “Choose-Your-Own-Adventure” direction that had previously resounded among all of us. To stay on track, we need to remember our core goal:
“Create an interface to the city that encourages people to explore new places, events and areas of Cincinnati.”
With that in mind, our next step is to begin setting up some use-case scenarios from the perspectives of several potential users (e.g. Visitors to Cincy, Bored long-time Residents, New-to-the-town Users and Users taking out family or friends (Entertaining)). These scenarios will serve as guideposts for development, keeping us focused on our users and what they will potentially be doing with the app.
Posted in Design, Technology, Thinking | No Comments »
We made some breakthroughs as far as our process goes. We’ve come to an agreement about the hierarchy of our ideas and now it’s just going through and problem solving along the way. We have a pretty clear vision of how we want it to start and now it’s just making some decisions about filters and questions. We have some really awesome ideas about ways to expand the app, but for now, we’re just excited to be figuring out the basics.
Posted in Design, Fun, Technology, Thinking | 17 Comments »
Gatorade: Brand Videology (short) from Tether on Vimeo.
Since I can remember, I’ve been more attracted to how things get made, rather than the finished product. I loved watching Jerry Rice play as a kid (except for when he beat the Bengals in Super Bowl XXIII in ’89), but love even more how he trained in the offseason, running more miles than most distance runners. Or how a Ferrari is meticulously crafted in Maranello, hand-stitched, etc…not just what the car looks like finished. That’s boring. The making of the Thriller video blew my mind as a kid. B-Sides. Movie deleted scenes. Behind the scenes at Pixar. How a novel was written. The making of the perfect sandwich.
I love the process. That’s why I love design. So when I stumbled upon a gorgeous stop-animation video by Tether (Seattle) which chronicles the Evolution of the Gatorade G Series over 16 months of Research, Concepts and Designs…well see for yourself. I love how other creative minds tackle problems…how they approach even the most mundane or minuscule tasks and turn them into something much larger.
Great work, Tether. (also came across it via Creative Bits)
Posted in Design, Thinking | 140 Comments »